Recently in Consumer Trends Category

10 Most Tweeted Brands of the Week. Love it

| | Comments () |
I absolutely love the new Ad Age 10 Most Tweeted Brands of the Week list. Now of course, there are risks that some brands may try to game the system but I think that's unlikely. They're so focused on getting tweeted among their consumers that they probably won't try too hard to game the rankings itself. This week the Super Bowl and Google Buzz led the pack though I'm certain next week it'll be someone else. What's nice about this list is it not only tells us which brands are talked about the most but gives us a pop culture snapshot too in a similar fashion to Twitter Trends.

Ad Age Twitter Trends

The list uses a loose definition of brand to include Valentine's Day and movies like "MNIK" which stands for "My Name is Khan" (who knew!). For me most interesting would be the brands that do well even if they're not being launched that week whether as movies or products (Apple's iPad ranks high up there). Those are the brands that are succeeding on an ongoing basis. I suppose for them a deeper metric is the SIM Score which is the relative health of the brand versus its closest competitors across the social web. 

Does SIM mean big ideas matter less?

| | Comments (6) | TrackBacks (1) |
ideascartoon1.jpgThere's a lot of talk in the advertising industry of how big idea advertising is losing its importance. Rather everyday ideas, small and nimble ones that can activate consumers and influencers alike across the Internet seem to be getting as important. On our own internal social media email list, we've been having a raging debate on this too.

We're certainly moving to a world where it is important to listen, inform, activate, entertain and respond to consumers in a more continuos fashion.  This requires the clustering of marketing activities in new ways, having a continuos low-burn marketing effort in place 365 days of the year. It also means deploying new strategies and campaigns in real time based on the engagement with the previous ones or any particular event. It is constantly in motion as advertisers chase consumers across the different digital platforms and channels and try to keep pace with their changing needs, preferences and locations of engagement. It is about speed and relevance. 

I think it is fair to say that the notion of 365 day marketing or continuos marketing in a SIM world is a necessity. More and more brands think in these terms for digital marketing and practically every marketer will need to have a baseline 365 component to all their marketing plans.

Social media is not enough in a downturn

| | Comments (2) |
social_madness.gifNow before you start slamming me for selling out, let me explain what I mean (and yes, I was inspired by this cartoon). As I've been discussing on this blog and in a series of papers over the last two years, social influence marketing is going mainstream. It is becoming fundamentally intertwined with the core of all things digital. As such it is getting more difficult to separate social media and social influence marketing from other digital activities. 

That's a good thing for two important reasons. Firstly, social is increasingly becoming core to the web as it should be. And secondly, no digital strategy is complete without a social component. It would be akin evaluating whether you need to layoff employees in a factory plant without looking for operating efficiencies at the same time. 

In the last two years, I've done more social strategy engagements in more industries than I ever thought I would. From the auto industry to insurance, technology and consumer packaged goods, large brands are wondering how to tackle social influence marketing. Along with some really smart folks at Razorfish, I've been helping them. What has it taught me?

The Economist wrong on bling. I won't give it up

| | Comments (2) |
economist.jpg
I like The Economist magazine for a lot of different reasons. Insightful writing, balanced coverage, a global perspective and often a harbinger of trends to come. And then sometimes, it misses the point just a tad bit. Let me explain how.

The latest issue includes a thoughtful article on buyer psychology and how this downturn is resulting in a significant shift in how American consumers purchase and what they purchase. It's the whole post consumer world story and emphasizes that -

Few people seem consumed by a desire to consume, instead they are planning to live within their means, and there has been a backlash against bling.

Half of respondents to a survey from America and Europe say that the crisis has intensified their distrust of big business.

Brands must do!

| | Comments (1) |
Brands need to stand for something but also do something says Garrick over at our Digital Design Blog. I like that notion and it jives with how I have been thinking about the evolution of brands in a social world. (Side note, Garrick and I have a lot of conversations so we often feed on each other's thinking). 

brands_do.png
It really is time for brands to do more. Call it a desire for a better value exchange or building meaning for consumers or appvertising or think about in terms of brands doing more than forming emotional connections like supporting causes but the truth is that brands need to do more to become a part of our lives. We're tired of being a part of their worlds. That matters but our own worlds matter too and brands need to fit in more. 

The listening part is something that's very important to me. I still believe that brands don't listen enough. The Motrin episode is just the most recent example of what can happen if you don't listen. Some brand managers believe they own their brands and the consultants and brand gurus think that they know more about the brands than anyone else. They're in love with their brands. That used to be fine but not anymore.

A brand by virtue of its place in a consumer's social world is constantly evolved and in some cases even redefined because of consumer participation. The communities create and break the brand too. Its not just the property of the company behind the brand. This might sound strange but its true. Companies can and must do more to let go of their brands - to let consumers shape and influence it in the social web. When they do they will learn from their consumers how to become more actionable.

I believe the brands that let consumers co-create and co-evolve them are going to be the ones that win in the next decade. Now I wonder what Seth Godin, Jaffe Juice or Steve Rubel would think of this social media influenced perspective.

Companies need Social Media Czars

| | Comments () |
logo_adweek.gifLast week I was quoted in an Adweek article that discussed how large Fortune 100 companies are starting to hire new kinds of leaders to help them navigate the social media space. Talking about Ford, Intel and Pepsi, the article discussed the trend towards hiring social media czars that coordinate social media efforts across the organization within and beyond the marketing departments. I believe it is just a matter of time before most organizations either have dedicated roles like this or push their employees (or specially identified employees) to go through a social media boot camp of sorts. 

The way consumers communicate and interact has fundamentally changed. Recognizing that I probably sound like one of those social media evangelists, I do feel that organizations need to adapt as well. Whereas some departments need to adapt just to survive (Corporate Communications and Human Resources are the most obvious ones), others don't need to change but can benefit immensely by harnessing the social influence and the wisdom of the crowds.

And not just the organizations, but the agencies need to change too. Whether it be by encouraging every employee to become experts in the social media space or by hiring or identifying social media champions from within, they do need to identify new leaders. And these leaders need to think in terms of how their agency's service offerings must evolve to keep pace with the ever evolving social web. Ask me, this is something that I worry about everyday.

Is Social Influence Marketing bigger than radio? Someone thinks so and its not me

| | Comments () |
bj_fogg1.jpgLife begins to get easier when others talk about a topic that you've been going hoarse evangelizing. In an interview in Fast Company, BJ Fogg discusses the power of Social Influence Marketing and why it is so new and important.

Calling it interpersonal persuasion, Fogg sees it as something potentially bigger than radio. I for one couldn't agree more. He focuses on Facebook in particular but I believe the subject extends beyond Facebook to every digital platform and device. 

For reference, Fogg is an authority on persuasion and also one of the people behind Stanford's first Facebook class. Here's a key quote from the interview.

Facebook is the precursor of something I'm calling mass interpersonal persuasion. That is a new phenomenon and the most important thing to happen in the world of persuasion since the advent of the radio over 100 years ago. Radio changed the game for persuasion because it allowed a message to be broadcast to thousands and millions of people, which was previously not possible. TV was an extension of that, but I don't think it was the big leap that radio was.

Facebook takes very strong interpersonal influence dynamics -- the way people persuade each other face-to-face in small groups with peer pressure, reciprocity, flattery -- and allows those to be used on a mass scale because your social networks are built in. Friends influence friends, who influence friends, and that keeps rippling out. They can reach people very quickly for very little cost and ordinary people can set these in motion. It doesn't require a big broadcasting company or a big PR campaign. If you get the right message in the right way, you'll effect millions of people. Facebook has been the best platform for that, but I think in the future it will be commonplace.

Read the full interview over at Fast Company. I briefly met BJ Fogg last year while speaking at a conference in Denmark and found him to be insightful. He understands persuasion better than most people and its great to learn that he's looking at it in the context of social influence too.


Digital Darwinism. Is your brand digital?

| | Comments () |
Is there any such thing as a digital brand? Here at Avenue A | Razorfish, we certainly think so. Joe Crump, Vice President of Strategy and Planning explained it best when he spoke on the topic at Cannes recently.

In a nutshell, Joe contends that brands need to view the digital world differently as consumers form opinions of your brand in milliseconds. If they don't like what they see, they can shut you out forever or worse still use social influence to hurt your brand by telling their friends and the rest of the world how boring you are. Here's the slide deck.


The most digital brands are Google, Apple, YouTube, Flickr and Netflix. These brands scored the highest when we measured them against atributes like immersion (how easy it is for a consumer to become engaged with your digital home), social (whether a consumer finds your brand worth sharing), and adaptive (how well a brand responds to a consumer’s digital environment), among other qualities. Interbrand's top brands are Coca Cola, Mercedes, General Electric, Nokia and Microsoft. Download the Brand Gene Scorecard.

An automotive SIM wish list

| | Comments (2) |
headlighta.jpg
Please note this article was first published on the Headlight Blog.

Recent research from the Journal of Advertising Research highlights that offline brand advocacy is significantly impacted by online word of mouth for the automotive product category. We also know that a significant amount of the online word of mouth happens at social media destinations. So how can an auto manufacturer take advantage of social influence marketing, which is about leveraging social media at every stage of a marketing campaign and beyond, to harness the peer and anonymous influences?

Knowing how to tap into that social influence can be challenging for an auto manufacturer. Here are five tips for automakers as they attempt to harness the social influence.

1. Market to the peer influencers as well
Auto purchasing decisions are rarely made in isolation. Think hard about the spheres of influence both online and offline that affect a specific customer segment’s decision-making process and find ways to target those influencers as well. For example, if you’re selling a car to a college student, you can also promote the vehicle online (as a great college car) to the parents of the buyer.

2. Allow for the social influence to take place more naturally
A passionate customer’s relationship with an auto brand is never a private relationship. The customer invariably wants to showcase that relationship in some public form. Provide him or her with enough digital artifacts to do so. There’s memorabilia in the offline space, but what about memorabilia for a social network? Is it available on your website? And I don’t just mean screensavers.

3. Market to your current car owners more aggressively
Most auto manufacturers don’t do enough to harness the passions of current car owners. They’re your most valuable marketers as they strongly influence their peers. Find ways to keep them excited and engaged with the brand on an ongoing basis. Now with marketing through social media, this has finally gotten easier. Take advantage of it and give them more excuses to talk about your brand when they socialize online.

4. Redesign your website to allow for group purchasing decisions
Growing up, my father always made my mother, brother and me active stakeholders when he went shopping for a new car. We’d look at brochures together; visit car dealerships, debate over dinner and vote for our favorites. No auto manufacturer lets me take that experience online. Auto purchases invariably are group decisions, so provide customers with the tools to share information, debate (via social networks or otherwise) and make decisions as a group. You’ll win more customers.

5. Direct customers to third-party experts online
Web behavior has changed, whether you like it or not. Customers will hop between third-party review sites, social networks and competing auto manufacturer websites as they make the purchasing decisions. Instead of ignoring this behavior, embrace it. Point your site visitors to the most authoritative blogs and auto review sites and let those customers tag and catalog that information. They’ll become more informed buyers and you’ll build vital trust by pointing them to the right places. Don’t worry; they’ll come back to your site when they’re ready to buy.

Arguably, over the last few years auto manufacturers have taken some great strides in the social media domain. The challenge now is to lead the way in the next phase of social influence marketing. It’s when the auto manufacturers can truly go social and allow for those peer and anonymous influences to take place naturally. We’re all waiting to see who will do that first and how.

View other articles pertaining to Digital Automotive Trends on the Headlight Blog.

About this Archive

This page is a archive of recent entries in the Consumer Trends category.

Applications is the previous category.

Culture is the next category.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.